Moderators: Rustie Gustie, Duck
silentp wrote:Chapel Partner wrote:... Pat Haws coached both sports at the time, now just coaches soccer.
He did...
http://www.gojohnnies.com/news/2010/3/3 ... ?path=msoc
wonderboy33 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Hauck's Trials experience and National Records occur post high-school? Why are we considering this information when evaluating the best recruit? Also, Mac, I realize that it's easier for us to only evaluate high school results because of your list but if we're talking about the best recruits, club times should be taken into account. It doesn't matter whether you achieved your times in HS or Club, fast is fast. Yes Chapel, my name should be thrown into the mix. My times would be at the top or near the top of most of the events on the list.
wonderboy33 wrote:caveman12 wrote:Get over yourself, MAC's original post states that it's top recruits based off of the HS state meet. No where does it say it's the all time list; in fact, the only time "all-time" has been thrown around has been for Hauck. I am failing to see where anyone is arguing this is the all-time list.
Can you read? Doesn't this sentence address your point?wonderboy33 wrote:Also, Mac, I realize that it's easier for us to only evaluate high school results because of your list
and then I go on to say...wonderboy33 wrote:if we're talking about the best recruits, club times should be taken into account. It doesn't matter whether you achieved your times in HS or Club, fast is fast.
I don't see the point of evaluating the all-time best recruit or recruits (you are incorrect, there were a number of names thrown out there, please read past posts) based on this list when we know it's not comprehensive. That's what I'm arguing. Please point out where I've been unclear and I will try to explain it to you.
Chapel Partner wrote:Yes, Hauck's college stuff happened after high school... But his college achievements just highlight how awesome he was.
Either way, I stand by a state record holder who could go anywhere going to St Olaf as being the best MIAC recruit ever... And in the discussion nationally.
Wonderboy, what were your times? Post them.
I was probably the 250th best recruit in UST history, and top 50 for transfers to GAC... Somewhere behind Mac of the MIAC... But ahead of Aaron Bitter... Ok, behind Bitter too.
caveman12 wrote:The purpose of this particular thread, Wonderboy, was to see some of the top MIAC recruits based off their high school state meet; in particular, the MN state meet. Everybody knows that not everyone swam high school and not every recruit was from MN. This is what can be considered a subcategory to the all-time listings.
caveman12 wrote: If the argument was that the all-time rankings were based off this list alone, then yes, I agree with you 100%. You’re argument is correct, but it was just off topic. That’s what my argument was, you are off topic. This is not the first time you have twisted the words of others’ in order to mention how you USED to be fast. Hence my "get over yourself" comment. You are one of the few people on this entire website that brag about their teenage life.
caveman12 wrote:I reread this thread, like you asked, and I stand by my statement. Hauck is the only person from this list that has been considered the all-time best. I suggest you read this thread again, buddy.
Mac of the MIAC wrote:As for best recruit in the MIAC, it's probably a toss up between Hagameyer and Stewart.
Mac of the MIAC wrote:My experience is that a vast majority of fast MN swimmers swim HS. Even further, they get their best times at a MSHSL meet, either sections or state. It's the biggest game in town and anyone who falls outside of that, myself included, is an exception. How many recruits have you looked up that haven't gotten their best times at a state meet?
If this list proves anything, its' that caveman12 is one of the fastest MIAC recruits of all time. Easily in the top 15.
Mac of the MIAC wrote:If this list proves anything, its' that caveman12 is one of the fastest MIAC recruits of all time. Easily in the top 15.
wonderboy33 wrote:Up until a few years ago, a MSHSL rule stated that you couldn't swim club and high school at the same time. There were many kids that swam club instead, based on numerous factors, not the least of which being the quality of their high school coach and program. Now, you can swim both high school and club, and even swim non-high school events at club meets while swimming club.
I only need to look at the results of my club to know that there are kids that swim faster at their USS Meets. They have the opportunity to swim against faster competition at National Meets, and swim more of the events that are competed on the college level. There are 6 events that are contested in college that aren't contested in high school. Based on that, there are kids that only get the opportunity to swim their best events at club meets (i.e. 200 back, 1650, etc.). Wasn't Hauck a 200 backstroker?
In order to find the most well-rounded swimmers, I would think a college coach would consider club results, as these are the kids that can generally swim more events. I look at a club like the Rochester Orcas, who have a Senior Coach that I respect a great deal. His kids swim extremely fast, and a number of them have chosen to swim club instead of high school. I believe the Foxjet Coach encourages her kids to swim club only, if they have goals that extend further than high school competition. Again, this has changed a bit the last few years with the rule change.
For boys, high school can sometimes be the only opportunity for them to taper for a short course meet. Some of them come back to their club teams to swim after high school, but then you're hedging your bets on a second taper, or an extended taper. Then you're depending on what kind of training they've done during the high school season in order to ensure fast swims beyond that season. If they get their best times during high school, as many of them do, it's because they can't taper for short course club competition. They can only taper for long course during the summer, and it depends on how dedicated they are during that time.
High school coaches have it easy in a way. They get to take what the club coach has started in the fall, and build on that through their season. Most of them taper down to nearly nothing, as their really are no distance events, and the high school state meet is 2 days, as opposed to a wider range of events and 4 days of swimming at a USS state meet. This makes it difficult to ensure fast swimming when the boys come back for a second taper with club. In addition, high school coaches are able to require daily attendance without risk of losing kids and revenue.
The challenge for club coaches moving forward is to make club swimming more desirable to more people. Who wants to swim at a 6+ hour session when you can be at the pool for 2 hours or less, swim a few events, and be home with plenty of time for other activities? What we've done at my club, is try to incorporate more of the "high school type" meets, with smaller sessions, and more creative event offerings. Trying to add the team aspect on more occasions than just the state meets will be key as well. That's the future of club swimming in my opinion.
Return to Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest