Colbybr wrote:On the eve of the Kenyon Invite (full disclosure: I'm coaching at the meet and bored in my hotel room) I found this article on Kenyon's athletic website: http://www.kenyon.edu/x21645.xml
The article suggests that Steen is a prolific coach that you can compare to, among others, Red Auerbach, John Wooden and Vince Lombardi. It then goes on to say that you really can't compare him to these coaches because he was won more titles than all of them combined. What do people think? Is Steen the greatest coach in all of sport or is this a bit of hyperbole?

Colbybr wrote:On the eve of the Kenyon Invite (full disclosure: I'm coaching at the meet and bored in my hotel room) I found this article on Kenyon's athletic website: http://www.kenyon.edu/x21645.xml
The article suggests that Steen is a prolific coach that you can compare to, among others, Red Auerbach, John Wooden and Vince Lombardi. It then goes on to say that you really can't compare him to these coaches because he was won more titles than all of them combined. What do people think? Is Steen the greatest coach in all of sport or is this a bit of hyperbole?
Chapel Partner wrote:Besides ridiculous, the article is also inaccurate in saying Steen's "trophy case holds more championship hardware than all of them combined."
The combined championships of the guys named: 39
Wooden - 10
Stenegel - 7
Red - 9
Blake - 8
Lombardi - 5 (includes Super Bowls and NFL championships before they had a Super Bowl)
Steen has won what, 28 titles? Yes, that is a lot. But not 39. And outside of this forum and maybe his high school guidance counselor, nobodies heard of him.
I know being heard of does not constitute being great at what you coach. But unless you are coaching at the top level in your sport, you can't really be considered the greatest in my mind.
It would be like the JV coach saying he's better than the varsity coach because he has a better record.

silentp wrote:Chapel Partner wrote:Besides ridiculous, the article is also inaccurate in saying Steen's "trophy case holds more championship hardware than all of them combined."
The combined championships of the guys named: 39
Wooden - 10
Stenegel - 7
Red - 9
Blake - 8
Lombardi - 5 (includes Super Bowls and NFL championships before they had a Super Bowl)
Steen has won what, 28 titles? Yes, that is a lot. But not 39. And outside of this forum and maybe his high school guidance counselor, nobodies heard of him.
I know being heard of does not constitute being great at what you coach. But unless you are coaching at the top level in your sport, you can't really be considered the greatest in my mind.
It would be like the JV coach saying he's better than the varsity coach because he has a better record.
28 is just the men's count...
Chapel Partner wrote:silentp wrote:Chapel Partner wrote:Besides ridiculous, the article is also inaccurate in saying Steen's "trophy case holds more championship hardware than all of them combined."
The combined championships of the guys named: 39
Wooden - 10
Stenegel - 7
Red - 9
Blake - 8
Lombardi - 5 (includes Super Bowls and NFL championships before they had a Super Bowl)
Steen has won what, 28 titles? Yes, that is a lot. But not 39. And outside of this forum and maybe his high school guidance counselor, nobodies heard of him.
I know being heard of does not constitute being great at what you coach. But unless you are coaching at the top level in your sport, you can't really be considered the greatest in my mind.
It would be like the JV coach saying he's better than the varsity coach because he has a better record.
28 is just the men's count...
Too bad Red didn't have the chance to coach a WNBA team too.
Father wrote:your reply is clearly more ridiculous and arrogant than the article.
funny boy.
Chapel Partner wrote:It would be like the JV coach saying he's better than the varsity coach because he has a better record.
Chapel Partner wrote:It would be like the JV coach saying he's better than the varsity coach because he has a better record.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests